Archive for May, 2009

FACING ALI in SEATTLE

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

A fantastically enjoyable two shows in Seattle—to see it on the big screen, all the work that so many talented people put into the film. The crowd laughed in places I never thought they would, and it was wonderful to see them really feel the lives of these ten not boxers, but people who are also boxers—and of course the inimitable Ali.

Still in Seattle. I will write a little more when I get home. Some reviews here. How fortunate I was to make this film, work with such great people, and spend so much time with these ten legends from a time long gone.

ABC Wide World of Sports. Bell-bottoms. Black light posters. Lava lamps. Watergate. Hockey players without helmets. A Cold War. And no answering machines, let alone a Blackberry.

Lots of love to you,

Pete

SEATTLE and the FACING ALI PREMIERE: TONIGHT!

Friday, May 29th, 2009

Well, my friends, today’s the day. FACING ALI is having its first ever public screening at the Seattle International Film Festival tonight, 7:00 (and tomorrow at the Egyptian Theatre). I’m driving down there, leaving in a few minutes, down the 99 to the I-5. Here’s to hoping the border’s clear, people come, and they have a great experience!

And may it look good…

Ali (don’t) bomaye!

Ali (don’t) kill him! We’re all in this together, after all. Here’s to joy.

Lots of love to you—armed with yoga, stand and fight!

Pete

The RUSE of FREE MARKET MYTHOLGY: BILL GATES, SR, on PUBLIC SUBSIDY and PRIVATE PROFIT

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

Way back I was engaged in a debate based on the idea that tax-payer subsidies in research and development have helped create a lot of wealth for private individuals.

Noam Chomsky in What Uncle Sam Really Wants (1991, pg 13) put it this way:

“The government has the public pay for research and development and provides a state-guaranteed market for waste production. If something is marketable, the private sector takes it over. That system of public subsidy and private profit is what is called free enterprise.”

In my original pieceDOES NOT COMPUTE: SUBSIDIZED HIGH TECH and the GATES to the FUTURE—I was referring to how public subsidy played a significant role in the development of the computer, I think, which went on into more private hands to make trillions, and be a marvelous machine for personal use in the process. Just today in fact I was at a wedding where a business associate of mine married his Blackberry.

Oh, ‘Gates to the Future’ was a play on Bill Gates’ name.

Anyway, I got flack for an idea that I really believe is statistically undeniable, and thus countered those comments here.

But was I right to hint that Bill Gates’ vast fortune isn’t simply the result of personal ingenuity and free market capitalism, but indebted to tax-payer R&D along the way? I don’t know—and believe you me I’m often wrong—but either way the point was echoed explicitly in the film The One Percent by none other than Bill Gates, Sr., of all people:

“People who have been enabled to accumulate very, very large wealth, have an indebtedness to society for having made that possible. They live in a place which generates individual wealth…[inaudible] for the micro-processor, the human genome, research—the Internet. None of those things would exist but for the 90 billion dollars that the federal government [the tax-payer] spends every year on basic research.

People don’t really see the role that, the use of tax-dollars, plays in making our economy so vibrant.”

And I don’t quote this in support of bigger taxes, at all. And god knows I am against a bigger State. I write it simply to reiterate what appears to me utterly obvious, regardless of dogma: free market is a euphemism for something that is often deeply—in many ways—subsidized and protected.

By the way, The One Percent is directed by Jamie Johnson, one of the heirs to the Johnson & Johnson mega-empire.

Bill Sr. can be seen below, starting around 4:10, being honest regardless of his son. Actually, clearly his son knows this too—and god love him for the hundreds of millions he and his wife have relentlessly poured into desperate causes:

FREE (of truth) TRADE

From, say, the criminal sugar subsidies out of Florida, punishing, (to the rest of the world) Agribusiness subsidies (massive, and deathly for the small farmer), the opening and/or protecting of markets through war (the oil market, for example—and remember opium? Ah, British free trade) and on and an and on—oh yeah, those free market bail-outs!—and the mix of, say, weapons and free trade that China is vilely exporting into Africa, I get truly sad endlessly hearing this talk of the so-called free market. Heck, I can’t even work in the States. Some free market.

And I think this manipulative mythology has contributed to the blindness that has prevented us from seeing the inconceivable debt madness and economic heist of the present day. In this climate of so-called free market we actually saw this lethal combination: grand subsidies and massive deregulation. In short, those who knew how to really play the game and find the loop-holes and send the lobbyists and fix the books (even legally), they got a virtual free-for-all—and I do not exclude from that group the piggy-ness of we middle-class consumers, whose debts ballooned pathologically over the last fifteen years.

Or to quote Mahatma Gandhi, loosely, because I see a lot of different versions of this quote:

“The Lord gave enough for everyone’s need, but not enough for everyone’s greed.”

But I do believe, slowly, maybe, we’re learning by thinking, as best we can, of the life of our great, great grandchildren.

Lots of love to you,

Pete xox

PS Getting Bill Jr.’s dad to back my thoughts about Bill Jr. and his computer fortune is a bit like this Marshall McLuhan moment in Annie Hall. And all that said, it doesn’t make it true—and it sure as heck won’t change public opinion. Nonetheless:

Woody: “If life were only like this…”

EASTER and CARING for our SISTERS and BROTHERS and the eternal rebirth of love

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

“It would seem that the Spanish bought Christ to America in order to crucify the Indian.”
—Bishop Vasco de Quiroga

When Easter passed, my lovely friend Tim suggested I made a faux-pas by posting, on the Easter weekend, a blog on veganism and not mentioning Easter.

He has a point. It is the most important Christian celebration in a largely Christian country (even though it appears its placement is sitting over the pagan celebration of the vernal equinox—actually a week after it, and something about the full moon, or so said the Council of Nicaea in 325 AD). Incidentally, cable television, reincarnation and gnostics were also banned at that Council, except on weekends.

Easter corresponds with the Jewish Passover. The Last Supper is often thought to be a Passover meal, and Jesus was a practicing Jew, after all. The fact is he never actually became a Christian until long after his death. Actually, I don’t know if he ever converted at all, although his followers definitely did. Either way, his teachings remain, at their essence, eternal and challenging: “No longer love thy neighbour, love thy enemy.”

That would be a good one for today, with discernment, of course.

Christians have different names for different days over the Easter weekend: Maundy Thursday, Good Friday, Hockey Night in Canada on Saturday (in the winter, 8:30 in Newfoundland) and Resurrection Day or Easter Sunday on, well, Sunday. And somewhere in there some parents also fit in a chocolate Easter egg hunt and families gather to break bread and give thanks.

Easter is the time of Jesus’ crucifixion and the miracle of Christ’s resurrection, of the possibility of eternal life, and triumph over the cross of the body, and the difficulty of being human on this crazy planet. The idea is wondrous, and interestingly placed over the vernal equinox—as the earth itself at that time, in so many ways, begins to come back to life, reborn, replenished, maybe even re-believing.

THE VEGETABLE GARDEN OF EDEN

Anyway, I was thinking about Jesus and veganism and if there is any connection? I do know this, before the Fall, the Garden of Eden was pure vegetarian. Seriously. You couldn’t find a shrimp salad anywhere, let alone something as revolting as a Big Mac.

That’s one nice thing, and perhaps to those who are subtle, a hint.

CHOOSING MERCY

Also, the idea of veganism and vegetarianism is often rooted in the belief that just as it would be undeniably wrong to give your dog Rex a brutal and miserable life of cruelty and confinement, and then cut him up for cutlets, so it is wrong, it seems to me, to do the same to those never-loved, never-seen animals we see saran-wrapped up all pretty and clean in the deli in Safeway. And Factory Farming and ultimately slaughterhouses do just that, en masse, 24 hours a day. Billions and billions of animals.

WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?

So how does this tie in with what Jesus would do, or want, where the tiger lies down with the lamb? Along with “Not only love the neighbour, but love thy enemy as thyself,” one of my favourite lines from Jesus—of many—is this:

“Whatever you do unto one of the least of mine, you do unto me.”

That’s a stunning statement. And I could be wrong, but I happen to believe that the animals in our dominion, that we brutalize for months or years in factory farms and slaughterhouses, qualify as “one of the least of mine.”

CHOOSING JUSTICE

As for loving people, I recently read some beautiful quotes from Christians who have fought also for the rights of the poor and persecuted, and to them I feel profound admiration and gratitude.

The Peruvian theologian Gustavo Gutiérrez, often thought of as the founder of Liberation Theology and the preferential option for the poor, wrote:

“If I define my neighbour as the one I must go out to look for, on the highways and byways, in the factories and slums, on the farms and in the mines—then my world changes. This is what is happening with the “option for the poor,” for in the gospel it is the poor person who is the neighbor par excellence.”

The “option for the poor” is one of the main ideas of Liberation Theology, known as “the preferential option for the poor.”

Leonardo Boff wrote:

“…the Church’s option is a preferential option for the poor, against their poverty.”

Boff goes onto say that the poor are:

“…those who suffer injustice. Their poverty is produced by mechanisms of impoverishment and exploitation. Their poverty is therefore an evil and an injustice.”

This mechanism is what is often called “structural violence”. Paul Farmer talks about structural violence at length in his Pathologies of Power, and it is from that book that I found these quotes.

Structural violence results from mechanisms that by their exploitative nature—their imposition or their limitation—lead to violence against people who are choiceless but to live and survive within these structures.

Samuel Ruiz, much beloved Bishop in Chiapas (but not with the government), and recently retired, said this:

“I came to San Cristobal to convert the poor, but they ended up converting me.”

Easter is many things, and crucially important to Christians. It tells of and symbolizes the resurrection, rebirth, something that transcends violence and injustice. And when we are kinder, when we reach out to those who are hungry, naked, thirsty, in that moment, maybe we are all reborn.

And then we start again.

Though perhaps not perfect, Tim, I hope this is an improvement over the Vegan/Easter-forgetting Blog.

Here’s to the beauty and miracle of Easter, and the lush earthly hope of the vernal Equinox, of rebirth and regrowth, to reaching out to the littlest of us all, and to the creatures who suffer to fulfill our human greed and ignorance.

Lots of love to you, with gratitude and surrender,

Pete xox

NOAM CHOMSKY on the RE-TELLING/SELLING of HISTORY, PAST and PRESENT

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Noam Chomsky, who is 80 now, has undoubtedly had a very difficult year. A few months ago his wife Carol, a brilliant woman in her own right, died from cancer. They had known each other forever, since Carol was five, and the two had been married for 60 years. I often hope he’s able to push on, having been such a remarkable source of information for so many, in multiple fields—and that he remembers and is energized by the important gift of his great intellect and work ethic.

Anyway, he wrote a powerful and sobering article that was published on his site the other day, and elsewhere. Even if you largely disagree with Noam’s political stance, it is highly recommended for the little reminders of historical facts that it gives—before such facts fall down the memory hole.

Entitled The Torture Memos, an excerpt:

Let us then turn to “reality itself”: the “idea” of America from its earliest days.

The inspirational phrase “city on a hill” [to describe the common American ideal of her own birth] was coined by John Winthrop in 1630, borrowing from the Gospels, and outlining the glorious future of a new nation “ordained by God.” One year earlier his Massachusetts Bay Colony established its Great Seal. It depicts an Indian with a scroll coming out of his mouth. On it are the words “Come over and help us.” The British colonists were thus benevolent humanists, responding to the pleas of the miserable natives to be rescued from their bitter pagan fate.

The Great Seal is a graphic representation of “the idea of America,” from its birth. It should be exhumed from the depths of the psyche and displayed on the walls of every classroom.

The current difficulties of indigenous people in both America and Canada (in Canada, an indigenous person is nine times more likely to be incarcerated than a non-indigenous person) may also be a reflection of curious “benevolence,” past and present.

And another:

In a 1980 study, Latin Americanist Lars Schoultz found that US aid “has tended to flow disproportionately to Latin American governments which torture their citizens…to the hemisphere’s relatively egregious violators of fundamental human rights.” That includes military aid, is independent of need, and runs through the Carter years.

Broader studies by Edward Herman found the same correlation, and also suggested an explanation.

Not surprisingly, US aid tends to correlate with a favorable climate for business operations, and this is commonly improved by murder of labor and peasant organizers and human rights activists, and other such actions, yielding a secondary correlation between aid and egregious violation of human rights.

These studies precede the Reagan years, when the topic was not worth studying because the correlations were so clear. And the tendencies continue to the present.

Small wonder that the President [Obama] advises us to look forward, not backward—a convenient doctrine for those who hold the clubs. Those who are beaten by them tend to see the world differently, much to our annoyance.

The man is still going strong, unstoppably, speaking as he does for the “wretched of the earth”, and whomever isn’t heard. I appreciate it—and learn from him—greatly.

The full article is here.

I had the privilege of interviewing Noam a few years ago. That interview is here.

Lots of love, and remembering, and action,

Pete

SUZAN MAZUR: Evolution, Epigenesis (and Epigenetics), Embryology and Funding

Monday, May 25th, 2009

Suzan Mazur, god love her, is on a relentless tear to force the media (and in some cases, the scientific community itself) to keep up and fairly and honestly promulgate the ever-expanding ideas on the Darwinian view of the theory of evolution. In some ways, evolutionary biologists have been the slowest to adjust (or maybe I just like to write that last sentence). Whatever, it’s a simply remarkable field, and Suzan Mazur is working it. Life, this wondrous life.

Suzan has written this online book—The Altenberg 16: Will the Real Theory of Evolution Please Stand Up?— which has wonderfully probing interviews, comments and quick exchanges in it (from Stuart Kauffman, Stuart Newman and Jerry Fodor to Richard Dawkins).

This is a revealing interview with Scott Gilbert, whose abstract from a recent paper is as follows, abbreviated:

In 1893, Thomas Huxley, wrote, “Evolution is not a speculation but a fact; and it takes place by epigenesis.” Note that evolution’s chief defender did not complete his sentence with the phrase “natural selection,” for Huxley was interested in the generation of the diversity needed for natural selection. That phase of evolution was regulated by development. Recent work has established five main mechanisms for the generation of anatomical diversity through changes in development, and this talk will review them and provide examples from the recent literature.

The short yet interesting interview with Gilbert is here.

An excerpt:

Scott Gilbert: They like the conflict theory. I found the Brooks’ article. It’s the February 18, 2007 David Brooks NYT column—and I’m quoting: “From the content of our genes and the lessons of evolutionary biology it has become apparent that nature is filled with competition and conflicts of interest.”

Suzan Mazur: Well he’s a vehicle of the economic status quo.

Scott Gilbert: Of the right. Yes. But I think that’s how evolution is taught. It comes around to what Huxley was saying about human nature, that we will use evolutionary biology to justify ourselves. And that in saying that nature is inherently amoral and self-interested—well, we’re just part of nature. We justify our doing evil things because we say our genes made us do it. Darwinian selection. We’ve been selected to be competitive bastards. We don’t usually hear about any other model, say, that we are the current pinnacle of the evolution towards cooperation.

Lots of love to you, and grand amounts of joyous, wonderful, even sexy cooperation in the complexity—and may such ideas find their way into National Geographic and the New York Times,

Pete xo

DR. PAUL FARMER, Partners In Health and Global Health Equity

Sunday, May 24th, 2009

Every time I read Paul Farmer or about Paul Farmer (of Partners In Health), I get both inspired and I learn a lot. I was reading Pathologies of Power this weekend.

Farmer works predominantly in a Boston teaching hospital and in Haiti, among the worlds very poor, and he points out the painful unethical avoidance of global health equity by medical ethics boards. From Pathologies of Power (pg 203-305):

“These [ethics] consults [on which he sometimes serves] are [in the West] often about too much medical care. That is, we are called to explore cases in which care is painful, expensive, and prolonged well beyond the point of efficacy…

But being a clinician who works in both a Harvard teaching hospital and rural Haiti, I can’t help but make connections between the surfeit on one side—too much care—and the paucity on the other…

What does bioethics have to say about this, the leading ethical question of our times [the right to health care for all]? Almost nothing…

One gets the sense, in attending ethics rounds and reading the now-copious ethics literature, that these have-nots are an embarrassment to the ethicists, for the problems of poverty and racism and a lack of national health insurance figure only rarely in a literature dominated by endless discussions of brain death, organ transplantation, xenotransplantation, and care at the end of life.

When the end of life comes early—from death in childbirth, say, or from tuberculosis or infantile diarrhea—the scandal is immeasurably greater, but silence reigns in the medical ethics literature.

Isn’t that revealing? Surely a sickness in itself, if not of the body our collective heart and mind.

Here’s a little thing on youtube on Farmer and Partners In Health:

And this:

Lots of love to you—and here’s to greater equity, gratitude, and the seeking of greater justice and health for all, regardless of their birthplace…

Pete

Hugh Brody, the Kwikwexwelhp Healing Village, and The Meaning of Life.

Sunday, May 24th, 2009

There is a correctional institute in British Columbia (Canada) called the Kwikwexwelhp Healing Village (good luck pronouncing that)—a remarkably progressive, alternative and controversial penal facility, and simultaneously limited in terms of numbers. Kwikwexwelhp is a fifty bed facility.

At its heart Kwikwexwelhp is a minimum security facility, with even less restrictions, whose healing/rehabilitation practices are inspired by indigenous cultural and spiritual practices. Its inmates are generally prisoners who, over time, have ‘cascaded’—a term used by the director of photography after the film—from maximum security, to medium security, to minimum security, and through their own initiative and courses taken, qualify for Kwikwexwelhp.

I just saw a simple, provocative and moving documentary (DOXA) on it by the wonderful Hugh Brody (I didn’t know much about him until two friends filled me in—thank god for friends), called The Meaning of Life. At the core of so many of the inmates’ original fracturing are those shameful, horrendous, racist residential schools. My god, the damage—the structural violence—inflicted by some of the people in that god-forsaken institution. Of course, the past doesn’t by necessarily absolve a crime in the present (it does in some places, politically), but it sure as hell is good to know the nature of cause-and-effect in a deeply fractured world.

Here’s a newspaper link about the film.

Really worth seeing.

Structural violence, institutional violence, happens in countless, faceless ways. Eduardo Galeano (as quoted in Paul Farmers’ Pathologies of Power) sums up one form of institutional violence here, from his South American viewpoint. Perhaps the view can be extrapolated worldwide:

The big bankers of the world, who practice the terrorism of money, are more powerful than kings and field marshals, even more than the Pope of Rome himself. They never dirty their hands. They kill no-one: they limit themselves to applauding the show.

Their officials, international technocrats, rule our countries: they are neither presidents nor ministers, they have not been elected, but they decide the level of salaries and public expenditure, investments and divestments, prices, taxes, interest rates, subsidies, when the sun rises and how frequently it rains.”

And these decisions, by whom is left out, result in what Dr. Paul Farmer and others call ’structural violence’—where limited options lead to violence, violence against the person with painfully limited options.

Galeano continues:

“However, they don’t concern themselves with the prisons or torture chambers or concentration camps or extermination centers, although these house the inevitable consequences of their acts.

The technocrats claim the privilege of irresponsibility: ‘We’re neutral’ they say.”

And the more privileged, the more affluent the country, would it be fair to say the more these sins are all of ours?

I don’t know the answer, but more compassion is always called for. Compassion with discernment, with love.

And here’s to all of us who are not (which is everybody), as Sister Prejean (of Dead Man Walking fame) once said, ‘the worst thing we’ve ever done.’

Lots of love to you,

Pete

MUHAMMAD ALI at SILVERDOCS for FACING ALI

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

I wish people would love everybody else the way they love me. It would be a better world.
—Muhammad Ali

I just heard the coolest news. Muhammad Ali has confirmed to be in attendance for the screening of FACING ALI at the Silverdocs Documentary Festival in Washington DC in the middle of June (I think the 16th).

That’s a wonderful thing for a kid (now 44) who directed Facing Ali and who, as a younger kid in elementary school, used to hand in spontaneous essays on Ali because…well, d-uh, he was the greatest. It was about the only work I did, if I remember correctly. No, there was the 50-page report on sharks, too—I loved sharks—and the five-foot papier-maché replicate hammerhead.

I didn’t have any gray paint, so I painted the poor creature beige. No one said a word. The underbelly was still white. Then my sister took ‘ol hammerhead to school for her grade eight project, never brought it back, and it ended up getting incinerated by some janitor who obviously didn’t get the lumpy and beige yet sublime skill of my artistic endeavor. But that, my friends, really was pretty much all the work I did.

I loved the Montreal Canadiens, as well, but that had very little to do with school. Au contraire.

Either way, after a couple of years of fanatical research, countless hours of archive-diving, interviewing some of his greatest (and forceful) opponents and all else required, collaboratively with a great team, I really look forward to meeting him (Muhammad Ali, that is—not the hammerheads).

Lots of love to you,

Pete

THE DANISH POET: A beautiful little film

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

The other day I stumbled upon this lovely Academy Award winning, 14 minute animated film called The Danish Poet. Checked, and of course, it’s on youtube. Really a sweet watch. Watching, I just loved the narration, and it turned out to be the wonderful Liv Ullman, from countless movies. She does all the characters in the same voice. It’s great. She was in a lot of Ingemar Bergman films.

Anyway, it’s here, and reminds us of the sheer ‘remarkability’ that we’re here at all. The Danish Poet, on youtube:

Lots of love to you, and all those who somehow got together to help make us,

Pete